Randisi & Associates

Pre-Employment Screening Specialists

RANDISI & ASSOCIATES, INC.

410.336.0287
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • Background Investigations
    • Drug & Alcohol Testing
      • Urine Specimen
      • Oral Fluid Testing
    • QuickApp and QuickApp Pro
  • About Us
    • Why Randisi Associates, Inc.?
    • Testimonials
    • Testimonials in Chesapeake Human Resources
    • Privacy Policy
    • Consumers
  • Resources
    • Marijuana in the Workplace
    • Employment Screening & Drug Testing
    • Negligent Referrals?
    • Interview with Larry Wilner
    • Drug Testing Seminars
  • Partners
  • News
    • Background Checks
    • Business Success
    • Drug Testing
    • Personnel Management
    • Employment News
  • Request A Quote
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login
    • CRL Order Form
  • Payment
You are here: Home / Drug Testing / Which State’s Drug Testing Law Apply?

Which State’s Drug Testing Law Apply?

April 27, 2016 By Randisi Site Manager

Right Decision - Wrong Decision signpost isolated on white background
Right Decision – Wrong Decision

Often we get questions from clients operating in multi-states concerning which state’s drug testing law apply in a given situation. Recently a federal appeals court in Minnesota has held that the Minnesota drug testing statute applies to an applicant tested in Minnesota, even though the applicant was being hired for a job in another state.  Olson v. Push, Inc., No. 14-3160 (8th Cir. Feb. 22, 2016). Which State Drug Testing Law Applies The case involves a firm in Wisconsin who hired a Minnesota resident for a job in West Virginia.

This case highlights the need for internal expertise in state drug testing laws in which your firm operates. In this example, the Minnesota Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Workplace Act (“DATWA”), prohibits an employer from terminating an employee for a first-time positive drug test result. An applicant can of course be removed from the hiring process for a positive drug test.  Although the drug test had been given on a pre-employment basis, the employer placed the individual in the workforce before the drug test result had been received. This action made him an employee and not an applicant. Thus he was protected by the Minnesota law that prohibits termination for a first time positive drug test.

The court concluded that the Wisconsin employer was conducting business in Minnesota by conducting a drug test of a Minnesota resident.  In sum, the Court held that DATWA applied to this case because Push did business in Minnesota, hired a Minnesota resident and permitted the pre-employment drug test to be conducted in Minnesota.

Employers doing business in Minnesota and conducting drug testing in Minnesota should take note. 

This case also highlights the importance of waiting for receipt of the pre-employment drug test result before permitting an applicant to begin working.

 

Filed Under: Drug Testing

Testimonials

Video testimonial from Rebecca Yarrison Miller's Minuteman Press Owings … Read More>>

Latest News

  • What Is the Enemy of Customer Service?
  • Pair of Companies in the Trucking Industry Says Positive Marijuana Tests And Federal Regulations Contribute to Driver Shortage
  • Supreme Court Ruling Just Changed the Rules for Cannabis Liability Cases
  • Five Things Not to Do When Giving Gifts to Customers and Employees
  • Random Drug Testing Regulations for Safety-Sensitive Positions Upheld

Afilliate Organizations

Tazworks NAPBS

Request A Quote

How can we Randisi and Associates assist your organization with background checks, drug testing and pre-employment screening?


CLICK HERE to Request a Quote or Consultation

Contact Us

Phone: 410.336.0287
Fax: 410.296.6131

1810 – J York Road PNB # 185
Lutherville, MD 21093
Contact Us

PRIVACY POLICY

©2025 Randisi & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Site by SPARKS!

We use cookies to make sure you get the best experience on our website. You can learn more by viewing our Privacy Statement.AcceptPrivacy Policy